Thursday, January 27, 2011

Trixie Belden and the Clunky Characterization - Brought to You By UNICEF

This month, I started reading the Trixie Belden series, which features spunky 13-year-old sleuth Trixie and her close-knit band of friends and siblings, who call themselves the Bob-Whites: gentle Honey Wheeler, pretty Diana Lynch, resourceful Jim Frayne and Trixie’s brothers, witty Mart and studious Brian. I just finished the seventh book, Trixie Belden and the Mysterious Code, and while it has some intense scenes and a couple fun new characters, I found it harder to get into than the ones that preceded it. That’s because this was the point at which the writing of the series was taken over by a succession of ghost writers using the name Kathryn Kenny. Characterization was Campbell’s strong suit, and it wasn’t the strong suit of whoever was in charge of writing this volume, making it my least favorite of the series thus far.

The story begins with the Bob-Whites in an uproar because the school board disapproves of their club, mostly since there has been vandalism occurring on school property and they suspect gang activity. If the Bob-Whites can’t prove that their club is making a valuable contribution to society, they’ll have to disband. Frankly, this premise didn’t make much sense to me. What business is it of the school board what these kids do off school property? I could understand them saying they’re not allowed to wear their club jackets in school, but beyond that, it doesn’t seem like they would have that kind of authority. And what exactly would disbanding the Bob-Whites mean? The six of them are still going to hang out all the time no matter what, so what would be accomplished by that? And why can’t a club just exist for the sake of existing?

But the Bob-Whites have to do something, and quick, so Trixie formulates a plan. They’ll have an antiques show, selling some items and merely displaying others, and the money raised will go to UNICEF. I think that UNICEF is a worthy organization, and I’ve donated to it a couple of times myself. But I couldn’t help wondering, in the early chapters, if somebody from UNICEF paid this author off to turn the book into one big pitch to donate to the fund. “Working with other organizations in the United Nations, UNICEF has trained nurses, doctors, teachers, technicians, in about eighty countries in the world, helping them to make use of their own resources,” Trixie tells the rest of the club. “You see, it isn’t just for today they are helping, but for years to come.” And every time someone, especially Trixie, talks about UNICEF, you get something like this spiel, usually with shining eyes to accompany it. After a couple of chapters, though, that gets toned down a bit, so the book starts to feel more like a regular story and less like a PSA. And if Trixie’s speeches have inspired real kids to pitch in to help needy kids around the world, then I suppose it’s a worthwhile trade-off…

Once I got past the odd premise and the speechifying, what continued to distract me was the way in which the characters were written. They seem like themselves, but not quite, and some less than others. Mart isn’t quite as funny in this book, but generally, he seemed about right to me, as did Di and Jim. Brian mostly did too, though he seems excessively annoyed with Mart’s use of big words, and it’s silly to have him imply that Mart doesn’t know what any of those words mean when his sentences, while overblown, make perfect sense. Honey definitely seems a little off to me; she appears to truly resent Trixie’s sleuthing obsession, disregarding her own stated interest in becoming a detective herself. While she’s always been on the jittery side, it’s overdone here, not just with the mystery but with having her blanch at a Western and the sight of a pair of Samurai swords found in her attic. And Trixie is just so syrupy here, particularly when it comes to certain word choices, like her calling her father “Daddy” instead of “Dad” and showering six-year-old Bobby with terms of endearment like “lamb” and “honey”.

Bobby probably bugs me more than any other character, since he has such a distinctive way of speaking in the first six books and that’s all but tossed out the window here. Once in a while he’ll use a word like “holp” or “losted,” but mostly, he doesn’t sound like himself at all, and he doesn’t seem nearly rambunctious enough. Bobby usually makes me chuckle, but that didn’t happen much in this book. Meanwhile, Trixie’s mom comes across as very easy-going in the first six books, but here, she’s both a worrywart and a nag, not to mention seemingly a bit jealous of Mrs. Wheeler’s looks. Indeed, she seems very hung up on looks here, and her constant getting on Trixie’s case to not be such a tomboy got on my nerves.

Along with individual character differences, there’s a distinct difference in writing style too. Mostly, I noticed that while the first six books only let us peek into Trixie’s head from time to time, here, we get a glimpse of what other characters are thinking, too. However, with Campbell, we could pretty much infer what they were thinking without being told upfront, and that made for more dynamic reading. For instance, “The thing Jim liked best about Trixie was her spirit of adventure, her readiness to go anywhere any time and not hold back, afraid, as so many girls did. Lately Jim had been noticing, too, that Trixie was a pretty girl.” All of this rings true, but its presentation is more organic in the earlier books, particularly Mystery Off Glen Road, when he is so clearly annoyed by Trixie’s sudden infatuation with Honey’s cousin.

All that said, while certain aspects of the writing continued to grate a little as the book went on, I still got caught up in the story. The titular code doesn’t ultimately play a huge role in the book, but its initial introduction offers an intriguing glimpse into Jim’s family history, and Trixie finds a clever way to make use of it when she’s in a tight spot later. It would have been fun if the whole code could have been included as an appendix so that readers could come up with their own secret messages. Even with the nine code letters provided, you could do that to some extent.

Trixie and the others spend the whole book looking at various antiques, and those are pretty interesting. I kept thinking, “Too bad Antiques Roadshow didn’t exist back then!” Some of the stuff they round up seems likely to be pretty valuable. The swords are especially interesting, as are the characters who become associated with them. I also like Trixie’s kind-hearted but tough neighbor, Mrs. Vanderpoel, and her eccentric friend, the elderly Mr. Brom, who tells wild tales of local folk legends and bonds with Bobby as a result.

Though it’s a bit of a detour from the main story, I like the adventure that Trixie, Jim and Brian have when they go off in search of Reddy, the Beldens’ Irish Setter, one snowy night. It gives them an opportunity to show their ingenuity and resolve, and it’s nice to see Brian with a moment in the spotlight, since Mart tends to be in the thick of things more than Brian does. This is also the fourth book in the series to incorporate a holiday, in this case Valentine’s Day, and it’s fun to see the hints of romance blossoming as a result of the Valentine dance Di hosts. And while Campbell took a break from the bad guys in the last two books, a couple of pretty unsavory characters show up here, making it feel like a more traditional mystery, and there are enough new characters here that we don’t immediately know who to suspect of nefarious activity.

So I still recommend The Mysterious Code, but definitely not as a starting point. The established characters simply aren’t as vibrant here, and several of them don’t seem entirely like themselves. If you’re hooked on the characters already, there are enough interesting elements to keep the pages turning in the first of 33 post-Campbell Trixie books. Still, it’s good to know that they weren’t all written by the same person. Here’s hoping the next Kathryn Kenny is a little more to my liking.

No comments:

Post a Comment