I’ve read a lot of Christmas books, and some of my favorites are
inspired by Matthew 25, the chapter of the Bible that includes the
account of the separation of the sheep and the goats, with the sheep
being rewarded for clothing the naked, feeding the hungry, welcoming the
stranger and tending to the sick, for “whatever you did for one of the
least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.” Earlier this year, I
was surprised to realize that I’d never read perhaps the most famous of
the stories in this vein: Henry Van Dyke’s The Story of the Other Wise Man.
I made that discovery after reading my friend Beth’s
review of the film adaptation. Conveniently, we actually happened to
have a copy of the book, so I read it, but I didn’t get around to
watching The Fourth Wise Man, directed by Michael Ray Rhodes,
until this week, when I once again devoted the top slots in my Netflix
queue to Christmas movies.
It’s a reverent, no-frills
made-for-TV film that features Martin Sheen in the role of Artaban, the
wise man who spends the second half of his life searching for the King
whose birth was heralded by the night sky. Though he is the central
character, Tom Fontana’s screenplay shifts the focus away from him
somewhat by introducing a new character, Orontes, a slave pressed into
the sage’s service by his father Abgarus (Ralph Bellamy) and promised
freedom at the end of his journey, which he fervently hopes will be a
short one. Adding Orontes changes the flavor of the story significantly,
providing a constant foil for the selfless, determined Artaban and
allowing for the gradual development of another kind of hero.
The book’s tone is uniformly serious, but Orontes adds a comical touch
to the film. Alan Arkin really has the whining down in this part;
Orontes may be a faithful servant, but he rarely agrees with his
master’s ideas. He reminds me of Sancho Panza, resolutely trekking along
with a delusional Don Quixote. Artaban shows, thanks to Sheen’s
heartfelt performance, and Orontes tells, writing sarcastic letters to
Abgarus. His speech sounds more contemporary than that of the other
characters, accentuating his role as the voice of the skeptical
everyman. For Artaban’s quest, and his deviations from it, are not
rational. But they are good.
Sheen and Arkin perform
wonderfully together and also have the opportunity to act alongside
their children, Charlie Sheen and Ramon Estevez and Adam Arkin, in brief
scenes. More prominent are Eileen Brennan as Judith, the bedraggled
leader of a leper colony, and Lance Kerwin as Passhur, her blind son. In
the book, Van Dyke merely indicates that Artaban spent many years among
the disenfranchised; he covers this section of his life in a couple of
pages, whereas it takes up half the movie, allowing us to see first-hand
some of the godly work of this man who always arrives just a little too
late to see the King but never entirely gives up hope of finding Him.
Lovely Sydney Penny is also affecting as Shameir, the young teenaged
daughter of Artaban’s onetime colleague.
The movie is very
low-budget, seeming to use as few props as it can get away with and
featuring some not-so-special effects and very obvious pauses for
commercial breaks. Fontana takes more liberties with the Biblical
framework, actually inserting Artaban and Orontes into the scene of
Peter’s denial. He also adds a scene, mostly for comic purposes but also
to emphasize Orontes’ lack of devotion to the quest at that stage, that
has the servant attempting to fool his master into believing that he
has found the young Messiah. This may bother purists, but such scenes
work well for fleshing the movie out a bit. I’d almost call this more of
an Easter movie than Christmas, but during either season, The Fourth Wise Man is a moving tale of faith and compassion.
Reviews and essays, including all my reviews posted on Epinions from 2000 to 2014.
Showing posts with label Martin Sheen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Sheen. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Wednesday, January 26, 2005
DiCaprio Resurfaces as Con Man Extraordinaire
Poor Leonardo DiCaprio. It must be hard to go from the most popular guy
in Hollywood to the laughingstock is just months. Leo was a victim of
his own success, grinning out from king-size posters, whispering
fervently on that annoyingly spoilerific radio version of My Heart Will Go On
(which must have played about once an hour) and appearing in various
forms in the lockers and notebooks of millions of teenage girls across
the country. It was overkill, and for a while I wondered whether we’d
ever see him again. He seemed to drop almost entirely out of view. Then I
saw Catch Me If You Can.
It’s five or so years later, and Leo once again is cast as a teenager, just 15 at the earliest point in this movie’s chronology. The teen in question is Frank Abagnale, Jr., a sweet-natured kid who turns con man in order to evade the responsibility of choosing which parent to live with after their divorce. Once his ingenious schemes begin and he starts to make money, he becomes determined to earn enough to replace everything they lost when his father (Christopher Walken), a bit of a con man himself, got caught and had his assets seized.
I can’t help but be reminded a bit of Huck Finn with Frank Abagnale, even though the circumstances are entirely different. Both are kids who are absolutely brilliant when it comes to pulling off highly improbable schemes. Moreover, both start running because of their fathers, though Huck hates his Dad and Frank adores his. At any rate, there’s something very appealing about this young man. He’s very likable, and nothing he does has malicious intent. When Frank begs Carl Hanratty (Tom Hanks), the agent who has been chasing him, to call a truce, we wish he could just give up the game with no consequences.
DiCaprio does a fantastic job as Frank, giving us just the right combination of sweetheart and wise guy. It’s come to the point at which it seems silly to even entertain the suggestion that Tom Hanks could be lousy in a movie. His performance, complete with a heavy New York accent, certainly measures up to DiCaprio’s. While Hanratty is a bit harsher than most of the characters we are used to seeing Hanks play – as demonstrated in an amusing scene that may have been what earned the film its PG-13 rating – he is really a decent guy, and it becomes evident that as aggravated as he is by the fact that Frank keeps slipping through his fingers, he has come to care about the teenager.
Walken turns in a rather haunting performance as Frank Sr. We get the sense that his son is succeeding where his father failed. His father is proud and perhaps a bit jealous as well, and he doesn’t see surrender as a viable option. His son has the Feds on the run; that should be enough to make him happy. Amy Adams turns in a sweet performance as insecure Brenda Strong, a candy-striper to whom Frank becomes very attached during his tenure as a doctor. When she brings him home to meet her parents, he has to reckon with her father (Martin Sheen), who seems intimidating at first but turns out to be a big softie. I really enjoyed his scenes with this family and, as a Lutheran, found their devotion to that denomination charming.
There’s something vaguely campy about the style of this movie. It’s a drama, but it has almost equal parts comedy. As Frank runs the gamut of impersonations – substitute teacher, airline pilot, doctor, lawyer – he relies as much on his charisma as his impressive check-forging skills. There are many scenes demonstrating his remarkable quick thinking, and these are generally the most riotous in the film. His first encounter with Hanratty is especially hilarious.
Catch Me If You Can is a fun movie with a largely happy ending. Like The Terminal, it’s light-hearted enough that it probably won’t go down as a milestone in the careers of its main participants. But it’s an enjoyable couple of hours with little objectionable content, and it was what convinced me that DiCaprio’s career is far from over. Catch yourself watching Catch Me If You Can.
It’s five or so years later, and Leo once again is cast as a teenager, just 15 at the earliest point in this movie’s chronology. The teen in question is Frank Abagnale, Jr., a sweet-natured kid who turns con man in order to evade the responsibility of choosing which parent to live with after their divorce. Once his ingenious schemes begin and he starts to make money, he becomes determined to earn enough to replace everything they lost when his father (Christopher Walken), a bit of a con man himself, got caught and had his assets seized.
I can’t help but be reminded a bit of Huck Finn with Frank Abagnale, even though the circumstances are entirely different. Both are kids who are absolutely brilliant when it comes to pulling off highly improbable schemes. Moreover, both start running because of their fathers, though Huck hates his Dad and Frank adores his. At any rate, there’s something very appealing about this young man. He’s very likable, and nothing he does has malicious intent. When Frank begs Carl Hanratty (Tom Hanks), the agent who has been chasing him, to call a truce, we wish he could just give up the game with no consequences.
DiCaprio does a fantastic job as Frank, giving us just the right combination of sweetheart and wise guy. It’s come to the point at which it seems silly to even entertain the suggestion that Tom Hanks could be lousy in a movie. His performance, complete with a heavy New York accent, certainly measures up to DiCaprio’s. While Hanratty is a bit harsher than most of the characters we are used to seeing Hanks play – as demonstrated in an amusing scene that may have been what earned the film its PG-13 rating – he is really a decent guy, and it becomes evident that as aggravated as he is by the fact that Frank keeps slipping through his fingers, he has come to care about the teenager.
Walken turns in a rather haunting performance as Frank Sr. We get the sense that his son is succeeding where his father failed. His father is proud and perhaps a bit jealous as well, and he doesn’t see surrender as a viable option. His son has the Feds on the run; that should be enough to make him happy. Amy Adams turns in a sweet performance as insecure Brenda Strong, a candy-striper to whom Frank becomes very attached during his tenure as a doctor. When she brings him home to meet her parents, he has to reckon with her father (Martin Sheen), who seems intimidating at first but turns out to be a big softie. I really enjoyed his scenes with this family and, as a Lutheran, found their devotion to that denomination charming.
There’s something vaguely campy about the style of this movie. It’s a drama, but it has almost equal parts comedy. As Frank runs the gamut of impersonations – substitute teacher, airline pilot, doctor, lawyer – he relies as much on his charisma as his impressive check-forging skills. There are many scenes demonstrating his remarkable quick thinking, and these are generally the most riotous in the film. His first encounter with Hanratty is especially hilarious.
Catch Me If You Can is a fun movie with a largely happy ending. Like The Terminal, it’s light-hearted enough that it probably won’t go down as a milestone in the careers of its main participants. But it’s an enjoyable couple of hours with little objectionable content, and it was what convinced me that DiCaprio’s career is far from over. Catch yourself watching Catch Me If You Can.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)