Friday, January 7, 2005

A King I Will Watch Again and Again

After seeing Shall We Dance, I’ve had the film from which that title was drawn on the brain. The King and I is one of many glorious Rodgers and Hammerstein collaborations I have had the pleasure of seeing on stage since first seeing the film years before. Though both productions were excellent, I was especially enamored of the first, presented at the Erie Playhouse, which featured my theater teacher as the king, his wife as Anna, and his children as Prince Chulalongkorn and Anna’s daughter. It was truly a family affair, chronicled in our high school paper and the Erie Times-News. In order to make his role as authentic as possible, Mr. Gandolfo consented to having his head shaved; that was only one component in a masterful portrayal of one of my favorite Rodgers and Hammerstein characters. Several years later, he took the director’s seat as his son assumed the role of the king in my alma mater’s presentation of the show. I imagine it must have been a slightly surreal experience.

I never met a Rodgers and Hammerstein musical I didn’t like – though my feelings concerning South Pacific are mixed – so it should be no surprise that The King and I meets with my approval. When I went to the high school production of the play, the walls were peppered with student-penned reports about Siam and the culture and how offensive this play was to many people living in Thailand (as Siam is now called). Like The Sound of Music, The King and I is a fact-based tale of a woman who becomes a governess for a rather difficult man and teaches him to see the world differently. But both films stray considerably from historical accuracy, and in the case of this film it is very difficult to know what actually did happen because the primary source, an autobiography by Anna Leonowens, has been denounced as untrustworthy. So maybe The King and I has no more basis in reality than Don Bluth’s Anastasia, but it’s a very enjoyable movie nonetheless.

Its key players are the title characters. The “I” is Anna (Deborah Kerr), a British widow who comes to Siam to teach the king’s multitudinous children. Though her personality, especially when in the company of the children, is sunny enough, she is by turns uptight, self-righteous and condescending in the presence of the king. Though this makes for many comical situations and allows her unique relationship with the king to develop, it also is the source of a great deal of heartache toward the end. She is nowhere near as likable as Maria in The Sound of Music, and at times I find I don’t like her very much at all. On the whole, though, she’s a sympathetic character.

But the king (Yul Brynner) is far more fun, and he is the reason that I find The King and I so enjoyable. He’s a fireball, assured in his authority until Anna comes along and questions it. But he is aware that there is a great deal that he does not know about the world, and he is the most eager of students, enthusiastically embracing such new discoveries as the phrase “et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.” He is also a loving father, as much as he can be when his children number in the dozens. Though he seems intimidating at first, he is in fact the most vulnerable character in the film, as we come to see all too well.

Aside from the king, the two most authoritative figures in his court are Lady Thiang (Terry Saunders) and Kralahome (Martin Benson). Thiang is the most favored of the king’s wives and becomes a motherly confidante for Anna, all the while making her aware of what is expected of her. Kralahome is the king’s stern advisor who is none too happy about the fact that an English woman has come into the kingdom and is treating the king with less respect than he deserves. Other significant characters include Tuptim (Rita Moreno), a girl from another kingdom given as a gift to the king, and Lun Tha (Carlos Rivas), the man she loves who is forced to deliver her to Siam. Although we see all of the princes and princesses in a group throughout the film, the only one really singled out is Prince Chulalongkorn (Patrick Adiarte), who frets over the fact that he must one day assume the throne from his beloved father.

A central source of conflict between Anna and the king is the matter of her living quarters. She insists on reminding her employer continually that she was promised her own house, not the guest room she currently occupies in the palace. When he finally agrees to acquiesce to her request, it is clear the film has reached a turning point. The latter half of the film largely deals with the grand reception Anna plans – at the king’s request – in order to prove to visitors from England that Siam is a civilized country and its ruler a gentleman, not the “barbarian” he was described to be. The meticulously choreographed evening reaches its climax with the performance of The Small House of Uncle Thomas, Tuptim’s adaptation of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel. While its craftsmanship impresses the visitors – one of whom is a former flame of Anna’s – its subject matter angers the king and sets the groundwork for the film’s tragic conclusion.

The movie’s songs are, of course, noteworthy. Getting to Know You is a delightful number involving all of the children. I read once that it was originally intended for South Pacific; while I think it could have worked there, it is a musical high point in The King and I that serves the same ice-breaking role that My Favorite Things did in The Sound of Music. Whistle a Happy Tune is a fun little song that gives insight into Anna’s personality while also providing audience members with a nifty trick to try – at least, those lucky enough to have the ability to whistle. (Sigh.) Shall We Dance is the closest we come to a resolution of the unconventional romance that seems to be blooming between Anna and the king. It’s a scene bristling with elegance and eloquence, and we are left to wonder wistfully how their relationship would have progressed if not for the unfortunate events that followed. My favorite song, though, is far and away A Puzzlement. Here we get a fascinating peek into the king’s psyche, and we learn that he is not nearly as sure of himself as everyone thinks he is. While it is the most comical number in the movie, it is also the most introspective and revealing. It is a agonized rant that, like Billy Bigelow’s Soliloquy in Carousel, removes any doubt that this is a good man with whom we should sympathize.

I once watched The King and I with some relatives, and when it came to the moment near the end when Anna denounces the anguished monarch, declaring him to be a heartless man who does not know anything about love, I objected. My aunt said it was true, but I will never believe that. I think he knew a great deal more about love than Anna was willing to admit in that moment, and I’ll always like him far more than Anna. Of all the Rodgers and Hammerstein endings, this is by far the least satisfactory. But the movie as a whole is wonderful, and the king remains a character who will keep me coming back to the movie in spite of its dismal conclusion.

No comments:

Post a Comment