I work in a mall that is in walking distance to a dollar theater. I have
often taken advantage of this fact when going to the mall with my
family or friends, capping off a shopping trip with a movie. But it also
came in handy the other day when I closed up my store on New Year’s Day
with an hour or so to go before I could get a ride home. I just headed
over to the theater and bought a ticket to whatever happened to be
playing closest to my time of arrival. The movie, as it turned out, was Shall We Dance,
which my parents had just seen two days before. They had liked it, so I
had no qualms about going in. And though my friend at work urged me to
opt for Shaun of the Dead - which didn’t start for another half
an hour - I think I slept easier with this zombie-free romance bouncing
around in my head.
The film stars Richard Gere, who already proved his worthiness as a soft-shoe in Chicago,
as estate lawyer John Clark, a man vaguely dissatisfied with his life
without quite understanding why. Each night during his ride home on the
train he passes by a dance studio and sees a beautiful but
forlorn-looking woman (Jennifer Lopez) through the window. Intrigued, he
decides one day to stop and investigate, taking the first step in an
experience that will change his life.
Upon his arrival, he
learns that he will not be spending much time with Paulina, the woman he
saw from the window, during the ballroom dancing lessons she signs him
up for. Instead, he will be under the tutelage of Miss Mitzi (Anita
Gillette), a mildly frazzled older woman with years of experience. His
fellow pupils are Chic (Bobby Cannavale), a man whose grace on the dance
floor is matched by his apparent homophobia, and Vern (Omar Benson
Miller), a big teddy bear of a guy who hopes to impress his girlfriend
with his newfound skill (and the pounds he will lose because of it).
Thrown into the mix is Bobbie (Lisa Ann Walter), an abrasive wannabe
diva who spends the bulk of her time at the studio practicing for a
tournament she can’t enter without a dancing partner, and Link Peterson
(Stanley Tucci), John’s eccentric coworker who secretly does Latin
dancing by night.
While the bulk of the movie follows John’s
growing love affair with the art of ballroom dancing, the subplot
focuses on his wife Beverly’s (Susan Sarandon) concerns that he is
engaging in an affair of a different kind. His long absences and
secretive behavior, not to mention the unfortunate experience of a
coworker, lead her to hire an investigator, uber-casual Devine (Richard
Jenkins), to scope out the situation. With the help of his quote-spewing
assistant Scottie (Nick Cannon), he uncovers the not-so-adulterous
nature of her husband’s activities. But is the marital rift that has
already developed reparable?
Shall We Dance is a simple
love story that comes to a somewhat unexpected climax. While this movie
was advertised as a Gere / Lopez collaboration, her part in the film is
smaller than anticipated. In fact, Sarandon’s role is just as
important. But Lopez brings suitable depth to a character who obviously
has darkness in her past that she hasn’t been able to evict. While Gere
is the film’s focal point, and we are treated to several shining
examples of his character’s newly acquired skill, it is the supporting
cast who make the film so much fun. Tucci brings delightful zaniness to
Link, also letting the audience in on the pain the derision of his
coworkers causes him. Jenkins makes his detective crusty but lovable,
and Cannavale introduces a comical imbalance between Chic’s machismo and
obvious delight in gliding across the dance floor. My favorite
character, though, is easily Miller’s gentle Vern, which was reminiscent
of Forest Whitaker’s turn as Nate in Phenomenon. Though he may
not ever be Fred Estaire, Vern has a heart to match his girth; he’s
easily the most huggable fellow in the film.
Shall We Dance
was never on my must-see list, but I’m glad circumstances conspired for
me to watch it. It’s a sweet film that will leave you smiling.
Reviews and essays, including all my reviews posted on Epinions from 2000 to 2014.
Showing posts with label Richard Gere. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Gere. Show all posts
Friday, January 7, 2005
Monday, January 3, 2005
Lots of Razzle Dazzle, But Not Much Else
Two years ago I watched as Chicago took home half a dozen Oscars
and wondered whether I would feel bitter about them when I finally got
around to seeing the movie. I like musicals, so I wanted to withhold
judgment, but when I did get around to watching it I was gravely
disappointed. I watched in the company of a roomful of people who loved
the film, so I kept my criticisms to myself until I got in the car upon
our departure. As it turned out, the members of my immediate family
shared my lack of enthusiasm. Maybe we’re just too old-fashioned.
First off, Chicago takes place in probably my least favorite decade of the 20th Century: the 1920s. Anything I see depicting that era seems awash in a haze of cigarette smoke and cynicism. I hated the supposed Great American Novel The Great Gatsby and Chicago didn’t redeem the 1920s for me. I found the dingy nightclub scenes bursting with slinky costumes more depressing than those in the jailhouse.
Don’t get me wrong. This is visually a very impressive film. I happen to dislike all the locales pictured, but I’ll still concede that it looks good. The costumes are flashy, the fantasy sequences are imaginative and the choreography is astounding. I wanted to like this movie, not least because a good friend of mine told me I had to see it. So I gave it a fair shot, but there’s just very little in the film that appeals to me.
I generally find Renee Zellweger irritating, and never more so in this movie, where she plays aspiring star Roxie Hart. When she discovers that the man with whom she is having an affair doesn’t intend to get her into show biz like he promised, she is so enraged that she kills him. Her steady husband Amos (John C. Reilly) rushes to her defense, claiming guilt for himself, until he discovers the affair and has a slight change of heart. I found Amos the only likable character in the whole shebang, and even that isn’t a very strong draw. We feel sorry for him, especially in the song Mr. Cellophane, but in the end he’s bland and not very memorable.
The guy who gets all the attention is Billy Flynn (Richard Gere), the slick lawyer who takes on Roxie’s case and tries to sweet-talk the public into sympathizing with her. This job is made more difficult by the fact that she possesses very limited reserves of tact and restraint, amusingly illustrated in We Both Reached for the Gun. Also making her life harder is Velma Kelly (Catherine Zeta-Jones), the slinky star-turned-murderess she once idolized. Now she stands as her rival to the public’s affections, and Velma’s been around the block a few times and knows how to play the game.
While I can’t find anything remotely likable about either of these leading ladies, Matron “Mama” Morton (Queen Latifah) does hold a certain appeal for me. She is also too cold and conniving for my taste, but she puts forth the appearance, at least, of being warm and motherly at times. There are moments when I think she really does care about the women under her watch, and her African-flavored introductory number is enjoyable enough. She’s my favorite of the gals, but given the company that’s not saying too much.
The whole idea of switching constantly between real life and some dream sequence in the minds of the characters didn’t work for me. I guess I like my musicals more straightforward than that. I have no trouble accepting people bursting forth into song. I do, however, tend to find self-referential theater less than satisfying. It’s a conceit that won many viewers of the movie over, but I’m afraid it turned me off. Add to that the dearth of sympathetic characters, songs that failed to stay with me and an overriding sense of cynicism and what I was left with was a masterfully executed movie that I didn’t get anything out of. It echoed the reaction I had when I saw my alma mater’s production of On Your Toes: Gee, the cast, crew and orchestra are doing a brilliant job, but this is the most pointless play I’ve ever seen. Obviously a lot of moviegoers disagreed with me, so I won’t tell you not to bother with it. But if you’re looking for a good musical, there are a couple dozen others I’d point you to first.
First off, Chicago takes place in probably my least favorite decade of the 20th Century: the 1920s. Anything I see depicting that era seems awash in a haze of cigarette smoke and cynicism. I hated the supposed Great American Novel The Great Gatsby and Chicago didn’t redeem the 1920s for me. I found the dingy nightclub scenes bursting with slinky costumes more depressing than those in the jailhouse.
Don’t get me wrong. This is visually a very impressive film. I happen to dislike all the locales pictured, but I’ll still concede that it looks good. The costumes are flashy, the fantasy sequences are imaginative and the choreography is astounding. I wanted to like this movie, not least because a good friend of mine told me I had to see it. So I gave it a fair shot, but there’s just very little in the film that appeals to me.
I generally find Renee Zellweger irritating, and never more so in this movie, where she plays aspiring star Roxie Hart. When she discovers that the man with whom she is having an affair doesn’t intend to get her into show biz like he promised, she is so enraged that she kills him. Her steady husband Amos (John C. Reilly) rushes to her defense, claiming guilt for himself, until he discovers the affair and has a slight change of heart. I found Amos the only likable character in the whole shebang, and even that isn’t a very strong draw. We feel sorry for him, especially in the song Mr. Cellophane, but in the end he’s bland and not very memorable.
The guy who gets all the attention is Billy Flynn (Richard Gere), the slick lawyer who takes on Roxie’s case and tries to sweet-talk the public into sympathizing with her. This job is made more difficult by the fact that she possesses very limited reserves of tact and restraint, amusingly illustrated in We Both Reached for the Gun. Also making her life harder is Velma Kelly (Catherine Zeta-Jones), the slinky star-turned-murderess she once idolized. Now she stands as her rival to the public’s affections, and Velma’s been around the block a few times and knows how to play the game.
While I can’t find anything remotely likable about either of these leading ladies, Matron “Mama” Morton (Queen Latifah) does hold a certain appeal for me. She is also too cold and conniving for my taste, but she puts forth the appearance, at least, of being warm and motherly at times. There are moments when I think she really does care about the women under her watch, and her African-flavored introductory number is enjoyable enough. She’s my favorite of the gals, but given the company that’s not saying too much.
The whole idea of switching constantly between real life and some dream sequence in the minds of the characters didn’t work for me. I guess I like my musicals more straightforward than that. I have no trouble accepting people bursting forth into song. I do, however, tend to find self-referential theater less than satisfying. It’s a conceit that won many viewers of the movie over, but I’m afraid it turned me off. Add to that the dearth of sympathetic characters, songs that failed to stay with me and an overriding sense of cynicism and what I was left with was a masterfully executed movie that I didn’t get anything out of. It echoed the reaction I had when I saw my alma mater’s production of On Your Toes: Gee, the cast, crew and orchestra are doing a brilliant job, but this is the most pointless play I’ve ever seen. Obviously a lot of moviegoers disagreed with me, so I won’t tell you not to bother with it. But if you’re looking for a good musical, there are a couple dozen others I’d point you to first.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)